Skip to main content

< Update - History, Current Status and Future Scenarios of Expanded Password System >

The concept of Expanded Password System first came up in 2000. It was followed by the prototyping in 2001 and the commercial implementations from 2003. Over the period of 2003 to 2008, the business was successful, with commercial adoptions amounting to over US$1 million.

It then ceased to grow as people were more and more carried away by the myths of biometrics and ‘password-less’ authentication which the advocates alleged would kill the passwords altogether. We knew that their allegations were false but people would not listen to our small voice. We opted to get out of Japan where biometrics people were overwhelmingly dominant.

Now, we have not a few friends and supporters globally.  In 2019 we saw the publication of our article by Taylor & Francis and the selection of our proposition as a finalist for “FDATA Global Open Finance Summit & Awards 2019”.

We will be able to come up with the commercial products for the global market just easily and quickly with a relatively small budget because the practicability-proven algorithms are already here.

Click the link for the full text.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/update-history-current-status-future-scenarios-expanded-kokumai/



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Expanded Password System to Complement FIDO2

2 is larger than 1 but is not necessarily stronger than 1, as two children could be overwhelmed by a grown-up. For a two-factor authentication to be really reliable, each factor should be reasonably secure and usable enough. On the other hand, ‘password-less’ authentication, however attractive it might sound, would only benefit bad guys as examined in the link page - https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/removal-passwords-its-security-effect-hitoshi-kokumai/ People who offer a token as 'a factor' of two factor authentication schemes could all be viewed as our potential down-stream partners. Among them are the people who offer FIDO2-compatible solutions. Put together, we could come up with the two-factor authentications that are much more reliable than otherwise.
Post a Comment
Read more

‘Authenticators’ and ‘Deployment of Authenticators’

There are not a few security professionals who wrongly mix up the layer of ‘authenticators’ with that of ‘deployment of authenticators’, talking as though the former and the latter were competing each other, for example, ‘Multi-Factor Authentication is better than a password’ and ‘ID federation is better than a password’. The password is an ‘authenticator’. So are the token and biometrics. Whereas MFA and ID federation like FIDO and Open ID are ‘deployment of the authenticators’ Expanded Password System is to be found on the layer of 'authenticator', while the likes of Open ID and FIDO are all to be found on the upper layer of 'deployment of authenticators' and, as such, the likes of Open ID and FIDO could naturally be our down-stream partners. There are also some people who wrongly allege that removing an authenticator should increase security.   They are plainly misguided as examined here – “Removal of Passwords and Its Security Effect” https://www.linke
Post a Comment
Read more

Quest for Global Ubiquity

We wish to make our Expanded Password System solutions readily available to all the global citizens: rich and poor, young and old, healthy and disabled, literate and illiterate, in peace and in disaster. For achieving such global ubiquity, we will need more and more research into such diverse disciplines as psychology, sociology, behavioural economics and brain science in addition to cryptography, safe coding and other security technologies. Your shout would be welcomed if you happen to know researchers who may be interested to include the issue of ‘identity assurance by our own VOLITION and MEMORY’ in their study subjects or if you yourself are interested to join us. We will shortly launch the global operation of promoting Expanded Password System from our headquarters set up in UK and this research program, which should naturally be international, is to play a significant role in it. Linked is my article posted 6 years ago, which might indicate an aspect of what we
Post a Comment
Read more